Lincoln wanted to send the drakes back to Afica. Too bad that Democrat shot him, huh?
Liberals arenât Hillary supporters. Sheâs a neoliberal, through and through. I donât wanna know where we would be if she were president.
I know where we are, and itâs bad. That is all.
Nice Try, Raggs, but Liberals do not want Hillary to be president. We donât want conservatives in the WH.
Why the hell are you so hung up on labels?
How do you know? Youâre not a liberal (as âliberalâ is defined in modern America).
I try to stay organized.
You canât redefine Liberal any more than you can redefine water or air. It is a specific thing. You canât say that corporate whoring Clinton style is Libralism, neo or otherwise. We have a separate name for shit like that - Libertarianism, you know, them open borders, deregulation folks who brought you mass immigration and the crash of 2008.
Do you find a lot of notes around the house that you wrote but you donât know what they mean?
I canât? Fuck too! Didnât liberals just get done redefining Marriage over the last few years? Liberals (as defined in todays America) redefine words all the time to suit their whims and needs of the moment.
[quote=âReggie_Essent, post:12, topic:19203, full:trueâ]
I canât?
[/quote]Nope
PS: Raggs - do you believe the purpose of marriage is a alliance the aim of which is procreation?
You didnât answer the question. Did liberals or did liberal not force a redefinition of Marriage through judicial fiat. Yes or No?
As for what I think marriage is or is not, that is irrelevant to this discussion. The point being that Marriage is a culture institution that predates all governments, all ideologies, all religions and spans all societies from the neolithic indigenes of Papua New Guinea to the fjords of Norway - yet never before since the dawn of time did any culture, civilization or tribes definition of marriage includes the barren and sterile relationships between couples of the same sex.
This so very basic REDEFINITION is the result of liberals force-fisting such a redefinition upon all of society, is it not?
So youâre wrong, Holliday. If liberals (as defined in America today) can redefine something as rock solidly understood for millennia as Marriage, then so too the definition of liberal can and has been redefined. So youâd better find a different label for yourself, man.
She is a member of the Fusion Party. That is Corporate Capitalism, Dem or Repuk.
Reggie, I think youâre taking this whole Milo thing a little too hard.
What are you deflecting from now, bro?
kinkyâŚ
LEGAL definitions change all the time. Hell, definitions of words do as well. That doesnât make them dennotative catch-alls for whatever garbage you want to throw at a word that day.