Ladies, is this accurate?


#14

So you agree with Lotus?


#15

Hmm lets say 7 billion peeps on the planet, bit less than half are male say 3.35 billion male, ok high school bf, the 3 guys in college(including post grad) and the hub, so about 3.35 billion minus 4 or 5 roughly speaking.


#16

So “all of them”. Uh huh, I knew I left that open…drats!

Sooo close…:anguished:


#17

Lotus and Starlin…Starlin m’Darlin, this

Length vs circumference in value to a woman?


#18

That’s a tough one Doc. I’m not sure.


#19

If I can offer any assistance in your research…

lemme know.
As a midget, I make a good baseline. :wink:

.


#20

:joy::joy:


#21

Sorry, TLDR


#22

It’s quite hilarious- worth the read


#23

I only read the left side cuz small print.

But it pales in comparison to a moment I had in 1964 at Ft Rucker. A WAC captain was marching a platoon of WACs down the street so I stopped to watch. They were doing the girl version of Jody Calls, counting cadence and such. And at one point the captain hollered, “come ON, ladies…there is 54 and a half MILES of swingin’ dick on this base, and if you bitches don’t shape up…you won’t be seein’ the first INCH of it this weekend.”


#24

Wow. Hilarious? I’d call it grossly misogynistic.


#25

Men paying new price for well used goods never ceases to amaze me.


#26

It never ceases to amaze me that any woman would marry a man with a used up, wrinkled little dick


#27

Dang… glad you talking about everyone but me :kissing_heart:


#28

You’re a virgin?


#29

You’ve seen his pix haven’t you?


#30

Nah… just no winkled up little dick.


#31

Meanwhile, you’d be the bridal bargain of the year.

Two cunts for the price of one.


#32

That was pretty fucking low - but then it’s you


#33

Low, perhaps.

But unwarranted?

I don’t think so. I don’t think I’ve crossed paths with a more ill-disposed, peevish termagant (how’s that one, Monsieur Johnson?) in my internet lifespan.

Besides, I wanted her to know I can communicate at her level if that’s what she prefers.