The Donald talking about 9/11 on 9/11 about buildings, bombs, planes etc

Just for starters, the size of the entry hole in the building. I don’t really have time to walk you thru this step by step; the info about the Tomahawk theory is out there for you to Google and read if you are really curious.

Since no 757-223 had ever crashed into a Pentagon up till that point or since then, we really don’t know what the structural damage would be. I do agree though, one would at least theoretically expect a larger entrance hole. I’ll have to give you that.

1 Like

One would expect a larger entrance hole, AND one would expect some damage on the ground

http://911review.org/images/snopes/20010911.JPG

1 Like

NIST report autopsied.

Is that your scientific proof that 19 morons pulled off 9 /11?

1 Like

Wayne Johnson1 month ago (edited)
To all of those who use the words “conspiracy theorist”. Are these people “conspiracy theorists” too? Below is a list of people who question what our Government has said about 9/11.

Senior intelligence officers:

1). Daniel Ellsberg, former military analyst and famed whistleblower said that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is “far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers”. He also said that the government is ordering the media to cover up her allegations about 9/11. And he said that some of the claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are credible, that “very serious questions have been raised about what they [U.S. government officials] knew beforehand and how much involvement there might have been”, that engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or psychologically beyond the scope of the current administration, and that there’s enough evidence to justify a new, “hard-hitting” investigation into 9/11 with subpoenas and testimony taken under oath.

2). Raymond McGovern, a 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials said “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke”, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job.

3). William Bill Christison, a 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis said “I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. … All three [buildings that were destroyed in the World Trade Center] were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings before 9/11.”

4). Lynne Larkin, a CIA Operations Officer who co-chaired a CIA multi-agency task force coordinating intelligence efforts among many intelligence and law enforcement agencies sent a joint letter to Congress expressing their concerns about “serious shortcomings,” “omissions,” and “major flaws” in the 9/11 Commission Report and offering their services for a new investigation (they were ignored).

5). David Steele, a 20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer, the second-ranking civilian in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine services case officer stated that “9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war”, and it was probably an inside job.

6). Robert Baer, a decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called “perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana said that “the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job.

7). Melvin Goodman, the Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as Senior Analyst from 1966 — 1990 and who also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College from 1986 — 2004 said “The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup.”

8). Major John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army, a Professor of History and International Relations, University of Maryland AND former Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency, former military attaché in China, with a 21-year career in U.S. Army Intelligence questions the government’s version of the events of 9/11.

9). Bob Graham, the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee and FBI informant had hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House.

10). Patrick Leahy, current Democratic U.S. Senator said: “The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush’s watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen?”

11). Ron Paul, current Republican Congressman calls for a new 9/11 investigation and states that investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on"@http://web.archive.org/web/20070121184445/http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/170107paul.mp3″ volslider=“y” style=“outline”]

12). Dennis Kucinich, current Democratic Congressman, hints that we aren’t being told the truth about 9/11.

13). Jason Chafetz, current Republican Congressman, says that we need to be vigilant and continue to investigate 9/11.

14). Mike Gravel, former Democratic Senator, states that he supports a new 9/11 investigation and that we don’t know the truth about 9/11.

15). Lincoln Chaffee, former Republican Senator, endorses a new 9/11 investigation.

Wayne Johnson
Wayne Johnson1 month ago
16). Dan Hamburg, former U.S. Democratic Congressman, says that the U.S. government “assisted” in the 9/11 attacks, stating that “I think there was a lot of help from the inside”.

17). Curt Weldon, former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee has shown that the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job.

9/11 Commissioners:

The Commission’s co-chairs said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements.

18). Lee Hamilton, 9/11 Commission co-chair, says “I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate should continue.

19). Timothy Roemer, 9/11 Commissioner, said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”.

20). Max Cleland, 9/11 Commissioner, resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”.

21). Bob Kerrey, 9/11 Commissioner, said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .”

22). John Farmer, Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission — who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry — recently said “At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened”. He also said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”

Other government officials:

23). General Wesley Clark, U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart said “We’ve never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I’ve seen that for a long time.”

24). Morton Goulder, former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism, along with Edward L. Peck, and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer J. Michael Springmann, jointly call for a new investigation into 9/11.

25). John Loftus, former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services says “The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defense of incompetence.” The Group Director on matters of national security in the U.S. Government Accountability Office said that President Bush did not respond to unprecedented warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive cover-up instead of accepting responsibility.

26). Lt. Col. Jeff Latas, President of the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board, who also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer and as a member of the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review, and who was awarded Distinguished Flying Crosses for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals is a member of a group which doubts the government’s version of 9/11.

27). Col. Ronald D. Ray, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan said that the official story of 9/11 is “the dog that doesn’t hunt”.

28). Louis Freeh, the former director of the FBI says there was a cover up by the 9/11 Commission.

29). Col. Robert Bowman, Director of the U.S. “Star Wars” space defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, who was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat missions stated: "If our government had merely [done] nothing, and I say that as an old interceptor pilot–I know the drill, I know what it takes, I know how long it takes, I know what the procedures are, I know what they were, and I know what they’ve changed them to–if our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive. “That is treason!”

30). Numerous other politicians, judges, legal scholars, and attorneys also question at least some aspects of the government’s version of 9/11.

1 Like

Popular Mechanics dealt with that question: the wings were sheered by the building ergo no hole.

You know a plane FLIES right?

The hole has been explained numerous times. They even found plane bits in the wreckage.

If the wings were sheared, where is the debris, and where is the damage to the building?

Utter nonsense. As is that pic of the planted debris.

The shear could have caused the wings to crumble into the plane thus joining it in the hole…,

And no marks on the building? Yeah, right. More of the official story that you have swallowed. Does your throat hurt?

I posted the link from whence it came.

You don’t think concrete can withstand a plane wing? Were you expecting a cartoon cutout of a plane?

1 Like

Well, if you watch the video of the plane flying into the WTC, you can see it cutting holes through the steel and concrete, so, yeah, I would expect SOMETHING on the building.

1 Like

A circumstance with different variables should turn out the same? Huh?

1 Like

Oh, OK. That’s a good explanation for why the wings disappeared into the aircraft with no visible marks on the building.

1 Like

Which proves they ARE reading our thoughts.

2 Likes

But on the towers the wings go right through the steel beams and then the nose cone which DM says is made of toilet paper penetrates the entire building and comes out the other side…

How do you explain that? :smile:

Yeah, if the wings were paper mache - but, I don’t think they were - that just me

Did you read the link provided?

The wing didn’t clip the ground first.

This has all been explained…in detail.